qveenkeke1234 qveenkeke1234
  • 02-12-2015
  • History
contestada

why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing historical event

Respuesta :

Goten
Goten Goten
  • 02-12-2015
Because a primary resource would be an interview of someone in that event or their diary or something they wrote about that event. If you couldnt find anything, you would have to use the secondary source, a book or article written about that event but the author wasnt in it or there
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Ancient Greece!! I need 5 sentences about why it would be great to spread the way with the Ancient thinker Hippocrates? Please help
I WILL mark brainliest. I NEED explanation, at least a bit! PLEAAASE! What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (–5, 3) and (7, 5)? A. -1 B
1.)Which state withdrew the most groundwater in 2000? What is the greatest use of groundwater? Why is surface freshwater use generally greater than groundwater
What is the answer to this problem I need help I don't really understand?
In their paintings, the impressionists often focused on
How many moles of oxygen are required to produce 37.15 g CO2? 37.15 g CO2 =_______ mol O2
Erin stores her photos in a box like the one shown. Use the numbers and symbols on the tiles to write a formula that represents the volume of the box. Symbols m
Normal resting blood pressure for a young adult taken at the brachial artery is said to be
Theories of oral communication that relates to philosophy/ psychology. Theory or concept
What are three proteins that are made at the cell's ribosomes?